I’m not a big fan of micro four thirds cameras. A lot of folks look at them as excellent entry-level cameras or alternatives to DSLRs but not me. I look at them as a second camera for serious photographers who do not want to bring along the weight of a DSLR. If you’re starting out: get a DSLR. As you skills improve, and you outgrow slow lenses, invest in quality lenses, then upgrade your camera body as your need for custom setups, high ISO and better auto focus arise. You really can’t do that with a micro four thirds, you’re stuck with the format. Yes, there’s a range of micro four thirds lenses, but the top end lenses in the market are made for DSLRs.
So, why am I writing about the Sony NEX-7? First, it’s not a micro four thirds; the NEX-7 sports a full APS-C sensor. Also, I kind of liked it! I’m not going to trade in my Canon for it and I still wouldn’t recommend it for someone who asks: “I’m starting out in photography, what camera should I get?” But, for a photographer who has an extra $1348 or $1198 for the body only, it’s a great camera if you’re looking to travel light.
What I liked:
What I didn’t like:
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.